Extras
To keep to a 30 minute format each week, we often have to bump or shorten segments that we liked. This page is dedicated to all the funny shit that didn’t make it into the show. Before you go clicking around here, though, I should warn you that some of the stuff didn’t make it because it was a little too raunchy. And if you’ve listened to the show, you know that you’ve got to get pretty profane before you’ve crossed the line here.
Anyway, enjoy.
And yes, there’s more coming…
Link to our You-Tube Page
Episode 4: SA-Extra-1 Eli Bosnick runs for Pope (Full Interview)
Episode 5: SA-Extra-2 “American Jesus” (WAV quality)
Episode 8: SA-Extra-3 Holy Babble Intro (Long Version)
Episode 9: SA-Extra-4 Carl from Post Rapture Looting (Full Interview)
Episode 12: SA-Extra-5 Darrel Ray, Author of “Sex & God” and “The God Virus” (Unedited Version of 2nd Part)
Episode 25: SA-Extra-6 Professor Chris Altman (Full Interview)
Episode 35: SA-Extra-7 Thomas from Thomas and the Bible (Full Interview)
Episode 53: SA-Extra-8 Jay Novella from the Skeptics’ Guide to the Universe (Full Interview)
Episode 59: SA-Extra-9 Eli Bosnick reviews “God’s Not Dead” (Full Interview)
Episode 62: SA-Extra-10 Paul from Quranify Me (Full Interview)
Episode 68: SA-Extra-11 Eli Bosnick reviews “Heaven is for Real” (Full Interview)
The Scathing Atheist 
For those who haven’t listened to the extras, you’re missing out in a big way.
Thanks,
I have started listening and Eli’s review of Gods Not Dead might have broken a rib.
Bout to get stoned and listen to all these motha fuckas right now
Where is the Murch ???
Right now we’ve got some logo merchandise available on Cafe Press: http://www.cafepress.com/scathingatheist
I desperately hope you kids release the rest of Eli’s interview on Left Behind here at some point!
Why do atheist fight so hard against a being that does not exist and a book of fiction that man wrote thousands of years ago?
I can’t tell if I should take this question seriously, or just make fun of you for asking it. I’ll go against my better judgement here and assume it was an honest question.
Atheists don’t find against god or the bible, they fight against the bat-shit crazy theocratic assholes that would try to use an imaginary being and a two thousand year old book to deny equal rights to others, to overturn democracy, to justify misogyny, to murder people who believe in the wrong space man. You’d have to be pretty adept at looking the other way not to see the harm that religion causes in this world. And I’d argue that you have to be a coward not to fight against it.
Shut up.
How many atheist insisted on this article be written in our constitution:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
[Extracted from The Constitution of the United States of America, Amendment I (1791).]
Atheists? My guess would be… none. Maybe 2? Not sure I get your point…
There is no point, just curiosity about the anti-religion campaign of the atheist movement in the world. A great deal of emphasis is placed on Article I of the constitution by atheist. I would have thought some of that group would have had a part in seeing it included in the constitution. I detect a lot of bitterness and hatred in the books written by atheist that I have read toward religious people. I am also curious about the Atheist Republic started by someone disappointed with Islam.
I don’t believe there was anyone directly involved in the drafting of the Bill of Rights that was an atheist. Deism tended to be the pre-Darwinian theological designation of the scientifically educated.
I’ve never detected any bitterness or hatred toward religious people in any atheist book I’ve read (nor any atheist blog, Facebook post, etc.), so clearly we’re not reading the same stuff. Curious if you could name one of these books you’re referring to.
DIATRIBES: Volume One 50 Essays from a Godless Misanthrope
It begins with a man dealing with his doubts, and what I can understand he still has doubts and deals with it with the
ridicule of religion by pointing out the faults and inconsistent doctrines of the follower of religion and the inability to empirically prove the existence of a god.
Another book I have started reading is: Your God Is Too Small 50 essays of life, love and liberty without religion by The Citizens of the Atheist Republic. Regardless of the way the book tittle reads it is about someones journey from Islam to atheism.
Okay, so your argument rests on your amateur psychological analysis of the author rather than the content of the book? I have to admit that I’m not familiar with the second book, but if your description of it comes from the same orifice you pulled your description of the first from, I’m comfortable dismissng your thoughts on it.
Doubt in anything causes one to blind his or her eyes to all other alternatives but the one he or she wants to adopt to settle doubts. Doubt causes a change in attitudes, causes one to say and do things contrary to one;s original beliefs to calm the turmoil in the mind. Even to the use of expletive language to prove they have overcome their doubts. I am glad you are comfortable with the dismisal of my thoughts. You would have to in order to have peace of mind. I find thinking about things that are contrary to my belief causes me to become upset and I want to reach out and ridicule the things that causes me problems. Well, anyway I am just an amateur with opinions whether right or wrong and I am excerising my right of freedom of speech which I hope you want deny me that right by your dismisal. I want to thank you for your helping me to understand the atheist’s beliefs. By the way the deist believe of our founding men of our nation is still not settled in concrete. Depending on the historical author you read after one gets different opinions of their beliefs.. They can’t seem to make up their informed minds on that subject. Well, thanks for your input because I am doubter just like all who seek what is the truth.
Are you sure you don’t need to have your dick bronzed for posterity?
Ignorance and stupidity rather than helping a friend who wants to know the truth.
And your ignorance and stupid remark does not in any way do away with doubts you have
You do not rate anymore of my time. Your book stinks and your remarks stink. Bye Bye
And yet he comes back March 6th.
And yet he comes back March 6th.
2Th_2:3 Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition;
Well I’m sure that’ll change everyone’s mind. Great jesusing there.
Do away with his doubts? That would mean absolute certainty, and unfortunately for you Mr. Weed, that’s not how science or skepticism works. Look up ‘teapot atheism’.
Php_2:5 Let this mind be in you, which was also in Christ Jesus:
Who or what is controling your mind? Dawkins, Harris, or Hitchens ? Who or what controls the mind becomes the dictator of the mind.
(aka Marcus Murphy) Logic and reason control my mind, and I honestly have no problem with them being my ‘dictator’. Why would I? Why do you?
“What controls the mind becomes dictator of the mind”
There’s a scary sounding tautology if I ever heard one. “That which controls the mind” and “dictator of the mind” are synonyms. Of course that which dictates to the mind is that which dictates to the mind. Not sure why anyone would need that spelled out for them.
Well, now aint you something. You are the sum total product of everything you have read or heard whether right or wrong and your logic and reasoning comes from the books, lectures, and studies you have made and these dictate to your mind your so called original reason and logic.
Php 3:18 (For many walk, of whom I have told you often, and now tell you even weeping, that they are the enemies of the cross of Christ:
The dictator of the mind is a god. What ever occupies the mind is like a god taking over your thoughts. A person needs something to help them have a purpose for living. A few reject the creator God and replace Him with something else to make their life have meaning.In your book you stated that you rejected the Christian God and replaced him with a philosopy of I can’t prove the existence of the Creator God and you began a new direction of reason and logic. But you are not sure that you are correct. Your hope is that you are right. Now, I am not including scientific logic and reason about the physical universe: I am limiting this discussion to what is in our minds about god, any god. And what makes a god a god to human beings. Your book is filled with self and how you became the scating atheist and produced a podcast to vent your beliefs and to ask others to join you and give you money in the form of donations.
Actually I never said any of that shit in my book. I’d encourage you to read it before discussing it. Nothing in it about how I “became” an atheist; nothing in it about why I started a podcast. Nothing in it about other people “following me”. Nothing about anybody giving me money.
And you don’t need to tell us that you’re not including reason and logic in your argument. That much is clear.
Dill Weed, when you can make any coherent sense, please feel free to comment, until then, shut the fuck up. Your religious psychobabble is annoying at best and painfully amusing at worst. When you can form coherent sentences and have an actual idea to communicate, we will be here. until then, bye!
P.S. Are you drunk? It certainly sounds like it.
Bye good ridance.
*facepalm*
How about that? Your true nature is coming out. You can’t stand it when someone challenges your stupid nonsense. You are like those preachers who write books for profit and ask people to give them donations so they can continue their ministries. Deception comes not only from religion but also from atheists like yourself. The way you communicate with someone is by gutter talk making you sound like a an dumb braying Jackass. INstead of putting your feces in a book put it in the toilet and flush.
I read your book and it was interlaced with statements about you and your progress to adopting atheist philosophy. It was also decorated with sewer words that belong in the toilet instead of a book. Some of my statements about donations were found on your web sight. And anyone who writes a book it is to make money otherwise why copywrite it.unless it is a release to find personal comfort in your own words and to get others to agree and become what you are. In that case just give it away without any profit. I helped you when I bought the kindle production. It was an interesting book with some true to life statements about yourself and occasionaly some truth about what makes an atheist an atheist. Maybe you need to re-read your own book to remember what you wrote. Be your own critic. You might be surprised about how much of self revelation is in the book. That was what I was looking for not the other stuff.
So your response here boils down to:
“I didn’t pay attention to what was written or what point was trying to be conveyed, I was looking for XYZ and (lo and behold) I found XYZ.”
Thanks for supporting my efforts to drag more people kicking and screaming from Jesus so that they can burn in hell forever. The souls of everyone I convert to atheism with your four bucks are on your hands.
I feel like David looking for a stone to throw at the giant Goliath of atheism, logic, and reason. Maybe if I keep searching I’ll find the right stone before the world ends in a firey finish.
Persecution complex. Notice how he chooses to engage this all important, world shattering, battle in a comment thread.
What hell? Does hell exist? Then maybe you are confessing to the possible existence of God.
You write smart in your book but your responses are to my comments are not the same smart guy that wrote a book meant to lead people to a hell that does not exist.
The burden of proof is on you now to prove that hell exists since you made the statement. I have never made such a statement.
Of course hell exists. It’s called the comments section.
Prove it.
Here I sit waiting for the raw sewage of your mind to spill out through your fingers and onto the key board or your computer to give me the normal ATHEISTISTIC PRIESTLY blessing. Get it over with so I can go on to bed Please feel free to flush your mind from all that filth. I am able to take it with all humility.
Whats the matter? Forget to flush last night?
Hate speech is speech that offends, threatens, or insults groups, based on race, color, religion, national origin, disability, or other traits. Should hate speech be discouraged? The answer is easy—of course!
diatribe
a forceful verbal attack against someone or something.
“a diatribe against God, Christ, Mohammed, and any other religion”
Are you still arguing with yourself? I thought god frowned on masturbation…
Thought maybe you would give a more intelligence reply instead of a hate diatribe. Since according to you god does not exist how can he frown on anything. So prove god frowns on masturbation. Be careful you might prove you believe in the existence of god.
Do you think that you or Sam Harris will write “A Letter to an Islamic Nation”?
Do atheist have a moral standard? Upon what do atheist base their morality? Who is the atheist Moses that gives the atheist a moral law?
oh, ok. Dilll Weed’s a troll. He did have me for a couple of days there, so bravo. It was the ‘do athiests have morals’ line that confirmed it for me.
Well, do they? Atheist have no way to know right from wrong so your stupid troll diatribe is moot.
If I could wave a magic wand and get rid of either rape or religion, I would not hesitate to get rid of religion. —SAM HARRIS
Is this an example knowing right from wrong?
Atheism is only a cover for the frustration of an unsuccessful religious search.
Jer_29:13 And ye shall seek me, and find me, when ye shall search for me with all your heart.
.
This is my last post because I have proven by reviewing all the replies to my posts and seeing all the stupid jackass replies of diatribes of attacks rather than sensible answers and the complete silence on some of my posts I now conclude that the old ancient book containing this statement is true “A fool has said in his heart there is no God” Good Bye It has been a hoot.
How can u guys say the bible is wrong i mean explain lakes how r they in the middle of land someone put them there like obiously the great flood made lakes read ur science